【全网首发】2021AIME I 真题及答案
文末答案
Zou and Chou are practicing their 100-meter sprints by running races against each other. Zou wins the first race, and after that, the probability that one of them wins a race is
if they won the previous race but only
if they lost the previous race. The probability that Zou will win exactly
of the
races is
, where
and
are relatively prime positive integers. Find
In the diagram below, is a rectangle with side lengths
and
, and
is a rectangle with side lengths
and
as shown. The area of the shaded region common to the interiors of both rectangles is
, where
and
are relatively prime positive integers. Find
.
Find the number of positive integers less than that can be expressed as the difference of two integral powers of
Find the number of ways identical coins can be separated into three nonempty piles so that there are fewer coins in the first pile than in the second pile and fewer coins in the second pile than in the third pile.
Call a three-term strictly increasing arithmetic sequence of integers special if the sum of the squares of the three terms equals the product of the middle term and the square of the common difference. Find the sum of the third terms of all special sequences.
Segments and
are edges of a cube and
is a diagonal through the center of the cube. Point
satisfies
and
. What is
?
Find the number of pairs of positive integers with
such that there exists a real number
satisfying
Find the number of integers such that the equation
has
distinct real solutions.
Let be an isosceles trapezoid with
and
Suppose that the distances from
to the lines
and
are
and
respectively. Let
be the area of
Find
Consider the sequence of positive rational numbers defined by
and for
, if
for relatively prime positive integers
and
, then
Determine the sum of all positive integers
such that the rational number
can be written in the form
for some positive integer
.
Let be a cyclic quadrilateral with
and
. Let
and
be the feet of the perpendiculars from
and
, respectively, to line
and let
and
be the feet of the perpendiculars from
and
respectively, to line
. The perimeter of
is
, where
and
are relatively prime positive integers. Find
.
Let be a dodecagon (12-gon). Three frogs initially sit at
and
. At the end of each minute, simultaneously, each of the three frogs jumps to one of the two vertices adjacent to its current position, chosen randomly and independently with both choices being equally likely. All three frogs stop jumping as soon as two frogs arrive at the same vertex at the same time. The expected number of minutes until the frogs stop jumping is
, where
and
are relatively prime positive integers. Find
.
Circles and
with radii
and
, respectively, intersect at distinct points
and
. A third circle
is externally tangent to both
and
. Suppose line
intersects
at two points
and
such that the measure of minor arc
is
. Find the distance between the centers of
and
.
For any positive integer denotes the sum of the positive integer divisors of
. Let
be the least positive integer such that
is divisible by
for all positive integers
. Find the sum of the prime factors in the prime factorization of
.
Let be the set of positive integers
such that the two parabolas
intersect in four distinct points, and these four points lie on a circle with radius at most
. Find the sum of the least element of
and the greatest element of
.
Solution 1 Make the translation to obtain
. Multiply the first equation by 2 and sum, we see that
. Completing the square gives us
; this explains why the two parabolas intersect at four points that lie on a circle*. For the upper bound, observe that
, so
.
For the lower bound, we need to ensure there are 4 intersections to begin with. (Here I'm using the un-translated coordinates.) Draw up a graph, and realize that two intersections are guaranteed, on the so called "right branch" of . As we increase the value of k, two more intersections appear on the "left branch."
does not work because the "leftmost" point of
is
which lies to the right of
, which is on the graph
. While technically speaking this doesn't prove that there are no intersections (why?), drawing the graph should convince you that this is the case. Clearly, no k less than 4 works either.
does work because the two graphs intersect at
, and by drawing the graph, you realize this is not a tangent point and there is in fact another intersection nearby, due to slope. Therefore, the answer is
.
Let be the intersection of
and
. From vertical angles, we know that
. Also, given that
and
are rectangles, we know that
. Therefore, by AA similarity, we know that triangles
and
are similar.
Let . Then, we have
. By similar triangles, we know that
and
. We have
.
Solving for , we have
. The area of the shaded region is just
.
Thus, the answer is .
~yuanyuanC
Suppose It follows that
Since
is a rectangle, we have
and
The equation of the circle with center
and radius
is
and the equation of the circle with center
and radius
is
We now have a system of two equations with two variables. Expanding and rearranging respectively give
Subtracting
from
we get
Simplifying and rearranging produce
Substituting
into
gives
which is a quadratic of
We clear fractions by multiplying both sides by
then solve by factoring:
Since
is in Quadrant IV, we have
It follows that the equation of
is
Let
be the intersection of
and
and
be the intersection of
and
Since
is the
-intercept of
we obtain
By symmetry, quadrilateral
is a parallelogram. Its area is
from which the requested sum is
~MRENTHUSIASM
Let the intersection of and
be
, and let
, so
.
By the Pythagorean theorem, , so
, and thus
.
By the Pythagorean theorem again, :
Solving, we get
, so the area of the parallelogram is
, and
.
~JulianaL25
Again, let the intersection of and
be
. By AA similarity,
with a
ratio. Define
as
. Because of similar triangles,
. Using
, the area of the parallelogram is
. Using
, the area of the parallelogram is
. These equations are equal, so we can solve for
and obtain
. Thus,
, so the area of the parallelogram is
.
~mathboy100
Let , and
. Also let
.
also has to be
by parallelogram properties. Then
and
must be
because the sum of the segments has to be
.
We can easily solve for by the Pythagorean Theorem:
It follows shortly that
.
Also, , and
. We can then say that
, so
.
Now we can apply the Pythagorean Theorem to .
This simplifies (not-as-shortly) to
. Now we have to solve for the area of
. We know that the height is
because the height of the parallelogram is the same as the height of the smaller rectangle.
From the area of a parallelogram (we know that the base is and the height is
), it is clear that the area is
, giving an answer of
. ~ishanvannadil2008 for the solution sketch, Tuatara for rephrasing and
.
Let the intersection of and
be
. It is useful to find
, because
and
. From there, subtracting the areas of the two triangles from the larger rectangle, we get Area =
.
let . Let
. Note,
.
Area =
. The answer is
. ~ twotothetenthis1024
We want to find the number of positive integers which can be written in the form
for some non-negative integers
(note that if
, then
). We first observe
must be at most 10; if
, then
. As
, we can first choose two different numbers
from the set
in
ways. This includes
,
,
,
,
which are invalid as
in this case. For all other choices
and
, the value of
is less than 1000.
We claim that for all other choices of and
, the values of
are pairwise distinct. More specifically, if
where
and
, we must show that
. Suppose otherwise for sake of contradiction; rearranging yields
. We use the fact that every positive integer has a unique binary representation:
If then
; from here we can deduce either
and
(contradicting the assumption that
, or
and
(contradicting the assumption
and
).
If then
, and it follows that
, also contradicting the assumption
. Hence we obtain contradiction.*
Then there are choices for
for which
is a positive integer less than 1000; by the above claim, each choice of
results in a different positive integer
. Then there are
integers which can be expressed as a difference of two powers of 2.
Note by Ross Gao
Case 1: When our answer is in the form , where
is an integer such that
.
We start with the subcase where it is , for some integer
where
(this is because the case where
yields
, which doesn't work because it must be a positive integer.) Note that
, and
. Our answer needs to be less than
, so the maximum possible result (in this case) is
. Our lowest result is
. All the positive powers of two less than
work, so we have
possibilities for this subcase. For subcases
and
, we have
and
possibilities, respectively. Case 2: When our answer is in the form of
, where
is an integer such that
.
We can start with the subcase where . We notice that
, and
which is less than
, so the greatest result in this subcase is actually
, and the lowest is
. Thus, we have
possibilities. For the other four subcases, we have
and
possibilities, respectively. Answer: We note that these are our only cases, as numbers in the form of
and beyond are greater than
.
Thus, our result is . ~jehu26
We look for all positive integers of the form where
Performing casework on
we can enumerate all possibilities in the table below:
As indicated by the X-marks, the ordered pairs
generate
which are invalid. Note that each of the remaining ordered pairs generates one unique desired positive integer. We prove this statement as follows:
Together, we have justified our claim in bold. Our answer is ~MRENTHUSIASM
First, you need to notice that it is impossible to have overlapping, making the problem easier.
Case 1 : There are
ways here, from
to
It is easy to see here that this continues all the way down to one. However, when the case gets to
, there are 5 ways instead of 4 because
is smaller than 1000.
Thus, So the answer is
Suppose we have coin in the first pile. Then
all work for a total of
piles. Suppose we have
coins in the first pile, then
all work, for a total of
. Continuing this pattern until
coins in the first pile, we have the sum
.
Let the three piles have coins respectively. If we disregard order, then we just need to divide by
at the end.
We know . Since
are positive integers, there are
ways from Stars and Bars.
However, we must discard the cases where or
or
. The three cases are symmetric, so we just take the first case and multiply by 3. We have
for 32 solutions. Multiplying by 3, we will subtract 96 from our total.
But we undercounted where . This is first counted 1 time, then we subtract it 3 times, so we add it back twice. There is clearly only 1 way, for a total of 2.
Hence, the answer is
Let the piles have and
coins, with
. Then, let
, and
, such that each
. The sum is then
. This is simply the number of positive solutions to the equation
. Now, we take cases on
.
If , then
. Each value of
corresponds to a unique value of
, so there are
solutions in this case. Similarly, if
, then
, for a total of
solutions in this case. If
, then
, for a total of
solutions. In general, the number of solutions is just all the numbers that aren't a multiple of
, that are less than or equal to
.
We then add our cases to getas our answer.
We make an equation for how this is true. a+b+c = 66, where a is less than b, is less than c. We don't have a clear solution, so we'll try complimentary counting. First, let's find where a doesn't have to be less than b, which doesn't have to be less than c. We have =2080 by stars and bars. Now we need to subtract off the cases where it doesn't satisfy the condition.
We first by starting out with a = b. We can write that as 2b + c = 66. We can find there are 32 integer solutions to this equation. There are 32 solutions for b=c, and a = c by symmetry. We also need to subtract 2 from the 96, because we counted 22, 22, 22 3 times. We then have to divide by 6 because there are 3! ways to order the a, b, and c. Therefore, we have =
~Arcticturn
Let the terms be ,
, and
. Then we want
, or
. Rearranging, we get
. Simplifying further,
. Looking at this second equation, since the right side must be an integer,
must equal
. Looking at the first equation, we see
since
is positive. This means we must test
. After testing these, we see that only
and
work which give
and
respectively. Thus the answer is
. ~JHawk0224
Let the common difference be and let the middle term be
. Then, we have that the sequence is
This means that the sum of the squares of the 3 terms of the sequence is
We know that this must be equal to
so we can write that
and it follows that
Now, we can treat
as a constant and use the quadratic formula to get
We can factor pull
out of the square root to get
Here, it is easy to test values of
. We find that
and
are the only positive integer values of
that make
a positive integer.
gives
and
, but we can ignore the latter.
gives
, as well as a fraction which we can ignore.
Since and
are the only two solutions and we want the sum of the third terms, our answer is
. -BorealBear, minor edit by Kinglogic
To prove this, let
, then
which is
then remembering that
and
are integers see if you can figure it out. -PureSwag
Proceed as in solution 2, until we reachWrite
, it follows that
for some (positive) integer k and
.
Taking both sides modulo ,
, so
.
When , we have
and
. When
, we have
and
. Summing the two cases, we have
.
-Ross Gao
As in Solution 1, write the three integers in the sequence as ,
, and
.
Then the sum of the squares of the three integers is .
Setting this equal to the middle term times the common difference squared, which is ,
and solving for we get:
The numerator has to be positive, so the denominator has to be positive too for the sequence
to be strictly increasing; that is, .
For to be a perfect square,
must be a perfect square as well.
This means that is divisible by 3, and whatever left over is a perfect square.
We can express this as an equation: let the perfect square left over be . Then:
. Now when you divide the numerator and denominator by 3, you are left with
. Because the sequence is of integers, d must also be an
integer, which means that must divide
.
Taking the above equation we can solve for :
.
This means that is divisible by
.
is automatically divisible by
, so
must be divisible by
. Then
must be either of
. Plugging back into the equation,
, so
.
, so
.
Finally,
First scale down the whole cube by 12. Let point P have coordinates , A have coordinates
, and
be the side length. Then we have the equations
These simplify into
Adding the first three equations together, we get
. Subtracting this from the fourth equation, we get
, so
. This means
. However, we scaled down everything by 12 so our answer is
. ~JHawk0224
Once the equations for the distance between point P and the vertices of the cube have been written. We can add the first, second, and third to receive,Subtracting the fourth equation gives,
Since point
, and since we scaled the answer is
~Aaryabhatta1
Let E be the vertex of the cube such that ABED is a square. By the British Flag Theorem, we can easily we can show thatand
Hence, adding the two equations together, we get
. Substituting in the values we know, we get
.
Thus, we can solve for , which ends up being
.
The maximum value of is
, which is achieved at
for some integer
. This is left as an exercise to the reader.
This implies that , and that
and
, for integers
.
Taking their ratio, we haveIt remains to find all
that satisfy this equation.
If , then
. This corresponds to choosing two elements from the set
. There are
ways to do so.
If , by multiplying
and
by the same constant
, we have that
. Then either
, or
. But the first case was already counted, so we don't need to consider that case. The other case corresponds to choosing two numbers from the set
. There are
ways here.
Finally, if , note that
must be an integer. This means that
belong to the set
, or
. Taking casework on
, we get the sets
. Some sets have been omitted; this is because they were counted in the other cases already. This sums to
.
In total, there are pairs of
.
This solution was brought to you by ~Leonard_my_dude~
In order for ,
.
This happens when mod
This means that
and
for any integers
and
.
As in Solution 1, take the ratio of the two equations: Now notice that the numerator and denominator of
are both odd, which means that
and
have the same power of two (the powers of 2 cancel out).
Let the common power be : then
, and
where
and
are integers between 1 and 30.
We can now rewrite the equation: Now it is easy to tell that
mod
and
mod
. However, there is another case: that
mod
and
mod
. This is because multiplying both
and
by
will not change the fraction, but each congruence will be changed to
mod
mod
.
From the first set of congruences, we find that and
can be two of
.
From the second set of congruences, we find that and
can be two of
.
Now all we have to do is multiply by to get back to
and
. Let’s organize the solutions in order of increasing values of
, keeping in mind that
and
are bounded between 1 and 30.
For we get
.
For we get
For
we get
If we increase the value of
more, there will be less than two integers in our sets, so we are done there.
There are 8 numbers in the first set, 7 in the second, 4 in the third, 4 in the fourth, 2 in the fifth, and 2 in the sixth.
In each of these sets we can choose 2 numbers to be and
and then assign them in increasing order. Thus there are:
possible pairings of
that satisfy the conditions.
-KingRavi
We know that the range of is between
and
.
Thus, the only way for the sum to be is for
of
and
to both be
.
The of
is equal to 1.
Assuming and
are both positive, m and n could be
. There are
ways, so
.
If bother are negative, m and n could be . There are
ways, so
.
However, the pair could also be
and so on. The same goes for some other pairs.
In total there are of these extra pairs.
The answer is
Let Then the equation becomes
, or
. Note that since
,
is nonnegative, so we only care about nonnegative solutions in
. Notice that each positive solution in
gives two solutions in
(
), whereas if
is a solution, this only gives one solution in
,
. Since the total number of solutions in
is even,
must not be a solution. Hence, we require that
has exactly
positive solutions and is not solved by
If
, then
is negative, and therefore cannot be the absolute value of
. This means the equation's only solutions are in
. There is no way for this equation to have
solutions, since the quadratic
can only take on each of the two values
at most twice, yielding at most
solutions. Hence,
.
also can't equal
, since this would mean
would solve the equation. Hence,
At this point, the equation
will always have exactly
positive solutions, since
takes on each positive value exactly once when
is restricted to positive values (graph it to see this), and
are both positive. Therefore, we just need
to have the remaining
solutions exactly. This means the horizontal lines at
each intersect the parabola
in two places. This occurs when the two lines are above the parabola's vertex
. Hence we have:
Hence, the integers
satisfying the conditions are those satisfying
There are
such integers. Note: Be careful of counting at the end, you may mess up and get 59.
Graph (If you are having trouble, look at the description in the next two lines and/or the diagram in solution 3). Notice that we want this to be equal to
and
.
We see that from left to right, the graph first dips from very positive to at
, then rebounds up to
at
, then falls back down to
at
.
The positive are symmetric, so the graph re-ascends to
at
, falls back to
at
, and rises to arbitrarily large values afterwards.
Now we analyze the (varied by
) values. At
, we will have no solutions, as the line
will have no intersections with our graph.
At , we will have exactly
solutions for the three zeroes.
At for any
strictly between
and
, we will have exactly
solutions.
At , we will have
solutions, because local maxima are reached at
.
At , we will have exactly
solutions.
To get distinct solutions for
, both
and
must produce
solutions.
Thus and
, so
is required.
It is easy to verify that all of these choices of produce
distinct solutions (none overlap), so our answer is
.
We take cases for the outermost absolute value, then rearrange:Let
We will rewrite
as a piecewise function without using any absolute value:
We graph
with all extremum points labeled, as shown below. The fact that
is an even function (
holds for all real numbers
so the graph of
is symmetric about the
-axis) should facilitate the process of graphing.
Graph in Desmos: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/tdbbceyb9f Since has
distinct real solutions, it is clear that each case has
distinct real solutions geometrically. We shift the graph of
down by
units, where
Taking the intersection of these two cases gives from which there are
such integers
~MRENTHUSIASM
Removing the absolute value bars from the equation successively, we get The discriminant of this equation is
Equating the discriminant to
, we see that there will be two distinct solutions to each of the possible quadratics above only in the interval
. However, the number of zeros the equation
has is determined by where
and
intersect, namely at
. When
,
,
will have only
solutions, and when
,
, then there will be
real solutions, if they exist at all. In order to have
solutions here, we thus need to ensure
, so that exactly
out of the
possible equations of the form
given above have y-intercepts below
and only
real solutions, while the remaining
equations have
solutions. This occurs when
, so our final bounds are
, giving us
valid values of
.
Construct your isosceles trapezoid. Let, for simplicity, ,
, and
. Extend the sides
and
mark the intersection as
. Following what the question states, drop a perpendicular from
to
labeling the foot as
. Drop another perpendicular from
to
, calling the foot
. Lastly, drop a perpendicular from
to
, labeling it
. In addition, drop a perpendicular from
to
calling its foot
.
--DIAGRAM COMING SOON--
Start out by constructing a triangle congruent to
with its side of length
on line
. This works because all isosceles triangles are cyclic and as a result,
.
Notice that by AA similarity. We are given that
and by symmetry we can deduce that
. As a result,
. This gives us that
.
The question asks us along the lines of finding the area, , of the trapezoid
. We look at the area of
and notice that it can be represented as
. Substituting
, we solve for
, getting
.
Now let us focus on isosceles triangle , where
. Since,
is an altitude from
to
of an isosceles triangle,
must be equal to
. Since
and
, we can solve to get that
and
.
We must then set up equations using the Pythagorean Theorem, writing everything in terms of ,
, and
. Looking at right triangle
we get
Looking at right triangle
we get
Now rearranging and solving, we get two equation
Those are convenient equations as
which gives us
After some "smart" calculation, we get that
.
Notice that the question asks for , and
by applying the trapezoid area formula. Fortunately, this is just
, and plugging in the value of
, we get that
.
~Math_Genius_164
Call AD and BC . Draw diagonal AC and call the foot of the perpendicular from B to AC
. Call the foot of the perpendicular from A to line BC F, and call the foot of the perpindicular from A to DC H. Triangles CBG and CAF are similar, and we get that
Therefore,
. It then follows that triangles ABF and ADH are similar. Using similar triangles, we can then find that
. Using the Law of Cosine on ABC, We can find that the cosine of angle ABC is
. Since angles ABF and ADH are equivalent and supplementary to angle ABC, we know that the cosine of angle ADH is 1/3. It then follows that
. Then it can be found that the area
is
. Multiplying this by
, the answer is
. -happykeeper
Let the foot of the altitude from A to BC be P, to CD be Q, and to BD be R.
Note that all isosceles trapezoids are cyclic quadrilaterals; thus, is on the circumcircle of
and we have that
is the Simson Line from
. As
, we have that
, with the last equality coming from cyclic quadrilateral
. Thus,
and we have that
or that
, which we can see gives us that
. Further ratios using the same similar triangles gives that
and
.
We also see that quadrilaterals and
are both cyclic, with diameters of the circumcircles being
and
respectively. The intersection of the circumcircles are the points
and
, and we know
and
are both line segments passing through an intersection of the two circles with one endpoint on each circle. By Fact 5, we know then that there exists a spiral similarity with center A taking
to
. Because we know a lot about
but very little about
and we would like to know more, we wish to find the ratio of similitude between the two triangles.
To do this, we use the one number we have for : we know that the altitude from
to
has length 10. As the two triangles are similar, if we can find the height from
to
, we can take the ratio of the two heights as the ratio of similitude. To do this, we once again note that
. Using this, we can drop the altitude from
to
and let it intersect
at
. Then, let
and thus
. We then have by the Pythagorean Theorem on
and
:
Then,
. This gives us then from right triangle
that
and thus the ratio of
to
is
. From this, we see then that
and
The Pythagorean Theorem on
then gives that
Then, we have the height of trapezoid
is
, the top base is
, and the bottom base is
. From the equation of a trapezoid,
, so the answer is
.
- lvmath
First, draw the diagram. Then, notice that since is isosceles,
, and the length of the altitude from
to
is also
. Let the foot of this altitude be
, and let the foot of the altitude from
to
be denoted as
. Then,
. So,
. Now, notice that
, where
denotes the area of triangle
. Letting
, this equality becomes
. Also, from
, we have
. Now, by the Pythagorean theorem on triangles
and
, we have
and
. Notice that
, so
. Squaring both sides of the equation once, moving
and
to the right, dividing both sides by
, and squaring the equation once more, we are left with
. Dividing both sides by
(since we know
is positive), we are left with
. Solving for
gives us
.
Now, let the foot of the perpendicular from to
be
. Then let
. Let the foot of the perpendicular from
to
be
. Then,
is also equal to
. Notice that
is a rectangle, so
. Now, we have
. By the Pythagorean theorem applied to
, we have
. We know that
, so we can plug this into this equation. Solving for
, we get
.
Finally, to find , we use the formula for the area of a trapezoid:
. The problem asks us for
, which comes out to be
.
~advanture
Let and
be the feet of the altitudes from
to
and
, respectively.
Claim: We have pairs of similar right triangles:
and
.
Proof: Note that is cyclic. We need one more angle, and we get this from this cyclic quad:
Let
. We obtain from the similarities
and
.
By Ptolemy, , so
.
We obtain , so
.
Applying the Pythagorean theorem on , we get
.
Thus, , and
, yielding
.
Let and
be the perpendiculars from
to
and
respectively. Next, let
be the intersection of
and
We set
and
as shown below.
From here, we obtain by segment subtraction, and
and
by the Pythagorean Theorem.
Since and
are both complementary to
we have
from which
by AA. It follows that
or
Since
by vertical angles, we have
by AA, with the ratio of similitude
It follows that
Since
by angle chasing, we have
by AA, with the ratio of similitude
It follows that
By the Pythagorean Theorem on right
we have
or
Solving this system of equations (
and
), we get
and
so
and
Finally, the area of
is
from which
We know that when
so
is a possible value of
. Note also that
for
. Then
unless
and
are not relatively prime which happens when
divides
or
divides
, so the least value of
is
and
. We know
. Now
unless
and
are not relatively prime which happens the first time
divides
or
divides
or
, and
. We have
. Now
unless
and
are not relatively prime. This happens the first time
divides
implying
divides
, which is prime so
and
. We have
. We have
, which is always reduced by EA, so the sum of all
is
.
Let be all terms in the form
where
and
is some positive integer. We wish to find
Suppose
for some positive integer
To find
we look for the smallest positive integer
for which
is reducible: If
is reducible, then there exists a common factor
for
and
By the Euclidean Algorithm, we have
Since
and
are not relatively prime, and
is fixed, the smallest value of
such that
is reducible occurs when
is the smallest prime factor of
We will prove that for such value of
the number
can be written in the form
where
must be a positive integer.
We start with and
then find
by filling out the table below recursively:
As
the answer is
Remark Alternatively, from
we can set
We cross-multiply, rearrange, and apply Simon's Favorite Factoring Trick to get
Since
to find the smallest
we need
to be the smallest prime factor of
Now we continue with the last two paragraphs of the solution above.
Let be the intersection of
and
. Let
.
Firstly, since , we deduce that
is cyclic. This implies that
, with a ratio of
. This means that
. Similarly,
. Hence
It therefore only remains to find
.
From Ptolemy's theorem, we have that . From Brahmagupta's Formula,
. But the area is also
, so
. Then the desired fraction is
for an answer of
.
The angle between diagonals satisfies
(see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclic_quadrilateral#Angle_formulas). Thus,
or
That is,
or
Thus,
or
In this context,
. Thus,
~y.grace.yu
We assume that the two quadrilateral mentioned in the problem are similar (due to both of them being cyclic). Note that by Ptolemy’s, one of the diagonals has length WLOG we focus on diagonal
To find the diagonal of the inner quadrilateral, we drop the altitude from
and
and calculate the length of
Let
be
(Thus
By Pythagorean theorem, we have
Now let
be
(thus making
). Similarly, we have
We see that
, the scaled down diagonal is just
which is
times our original diagonal
implying a scale factor of
Thus, due to perimeters scaling linearly, the perimeter of the new quadrilateral is simply
making our answer
-fidgetboss_4000
The expected number of steps depends on the distance between the frogs, not on the order in which these distances appear. Let where
denote the expected number of steps that it takes for two frogs to meet if traversing in clockwise or counterclockwise order, the frogs are
,
and
vertices apart. Then
, giving
; (1)
, giving
; (2)
, giving
; (3)
Plug in (1) and (3) into (2), we see that .
. Each step is one minute. The answer is
.
Let and
be the center and radius of
, and let
and
be the center and radius of
.
Since extends to an arc with arc
, the distance from
to
is
. Let
. Consider
. The line
is perpendicular to
and passes through
. Let
be the foot from
to
; so
. We have by tangency
and
. Let
.
Since
is on the radical axis of
and
, it has equal power with respect to both circles, so
since
. Now we can solve for
and
, and in particular,
We want to solve for
. By the Pythagorean Theorem (twice):
Therefore,
.
Denote by ,
, and
the centers of
,
, and
, respectively. Let
and
denote the radii of
and
respectively,
be the radius of
, and
the distance from
to the line
. We claim that
where
. This solves the problem, for then the
condition implies
, and then we can solve to get
.
Denote by
and
the centers of
and
respectively. Set
as the projection of
onto
, and denote by
the intersection of
with
. Note that
. Now recall that
Furthermore, note that
Substituting the first equality into the second one and subtracting yields
which rearranges to the desired.
WLOG assume is a line. Note the angle condition is equivalent to the angle between
and
being
. We claim the angle between
and
is fixed as
varies.
Proof: Perform an inversion at , sending
and
to two lines
and
intersecting at
. Then
is sent to a circle tangent to lines
and
, which clearly intersects
at a fixed angle. Therefore the angle between
and
is fixed as
varies.
Now simply take to be a line. If
intersects
and
and
, respectively, and the circles' centers are
and
, then the projection of
to
at
gives that
is a
triangle. Therefore,
~spartacle
Suppose we label the points as shown here. By radical axis, the tangents to at
and
intersect on
. Thus
is harmonic, so the tangents to
at
and
intersect at
. Moreover,
because both
and
are perpendicular to
, and
because
. Thus
We first claim that must be divisible by 42. Since
is divisible by 2021 for all positive integers
, we can first consider the special case where
.
Then . In order for this expression to be divisible by
, a necessary condition is
. By Fermat's Little Theorem,
. Moreover, if
is a primitive root modulo 43, then
, so
must be divisible by 42.
By similar reasoning, must be divisible by 46, by considering
.
We next claim that must be divisible by 43 and 47. Consider the case
. Then
, so
is divisible by 2021 if and only if
is divisible by 2021.
Lastly, we claim that if , then
is divisible by 2021 for all positive integers
. The claim is trivially true for
so suppose
. Let
be the prime factorization of
. Since
is multiplicative, we have
We can show that
for all primes
and integers
, where
where each expression in parentheses contains
terms. It is easy to verify that if
or
then
for this choice of
, so suppose
and
. Each expression in parentheses equals
multiplied by some power of
. If
, then FLT implies
, and if
, then
(since
is also a multiple of 43, by definition). Similarly, we can show
, and a simple CRT argument shows
. Then
.
Then the prime factors of are
,
,
,
,
, and
, and the answer is
. ~scrabbler94
Since the problem works for all positive integers , let's plug in
and see what we get. Since
we have
Simplifying using CRT and Fermat's Little Theorem, we get that
and
Then, we can look at
just like in Solution 1 to find that
and
also divide
. There don't seem to be any other odd "numbers" to check, so we can hopefully assume that the answer is the sum of the prime factors of
From here, follow solution 1 to get the final answer.
-PureSwag
It says the problem implies that it works for all positive integers , we basically know that If
, than from "USEMO 2019 Problem 4 which was
(mod
) we have that
. From here we can just let
or be a power of 2 which we can do
which is a geo series. We can plug in
like in Solution 2 and use CRT which when we prime factorize we get that
which like everyone knows. We use CRT to find that \begin{align*} 2^n &\equiv 1 \pmod{43}, \\ 2^n &\equiv 1 \pmod{47}. \end{align*}. We see that this is just FLT which is
we see all multiples of 42 will work for first and 46 for the second. We can figure out that it is just
which when we add up we get that it's just the sum of the prime factors of lcm(42,43,46,47) which you can just look at Solution 1 to find out the sum of the prime factors and get the answer.
Remarks: This was kind of used in what cosmicgenius and Solution 2 said and what mathisawesome2169 said and It "Reminded me of 2019 USEMO Problem 4 when solving the which gave
. Sorry if it's bad I need to do something else so I kind of rushed.
only needs to satisfy
and
for all
. Let's work on the first requirement (mod 43) first. All
works for
. If
, let
's prime factorization be
. The following 3 statements are the same.
(1) For
, no matter
, it is true
(2) For all
,
One can either use brute force or Dirichlet's Theorem to show such
exists. Therefore
(3) For all
,
According to Fermat's Little Theorem,
is sufficient. To show it's necessary we just need to show 43 has a prime primitive root. This can be done either by brute force or as follows. 43 is prime and it must have a primitive root
that's coprime to 43. All numbers of the form
are also primitive roots of 43. According to Dirichlet's Theorem there must be primes among them.
Similar arguments for (mod 47) lead to and
. Therefore
Make the translation to obtain
. Multiply the first equation by 2 and sum, we see that
. Completing the square gives us
; this explains why the two parabolas intersect at four points that lie on a circle*. For the upper bound, observe that
, so
.
For the lower bound, we need to ensure there are 4 intersections to begin with. (Here I'm using the un-translated coordinates.) Draw up a graph, and realize that two intersections are guaranteed, on the so called "right branch" of . As we increase the value of k, two more intersections appear on the "left branch."
does not work because the "leftmost" point of
is
which lies to the right of
, which is on the graph
. While technically speaking this doesn't prove that there are no intersections (why?), drawing the graph should convince you that this is the case. Clearly, no k less than 4 works either.
does work because the two graphs intersect at
, and by drawing the graph, you realize this is not a tangent point and there is in fact another intersection nearby, due to slope. Therefore, the answer is
.
Raybet比分 课程体验,退费流程快速投诉邮箱: yuxi@linstitute.net 沪ICP备2023009024号-1